Cruise Ship Aesthetics
on Life and Trust, Sleep No More, The Great Gatsby, and other Jazz Age immersions
We were all crammed into a small room that, despite its “art deco” furnishings could not hide its true self as a lounge peripheral to the hotel basement ballroom. We were lured in there by a character offering us secret investment information, but oh, what’s this, a mysterious woman coming in to whisper in the banker’s ear and pass him an unmarked envelope? What shenanigans are about to ensue?
On her way out, the mysterious woman attracted the attention of a man who loudly reported to the entire room that she had a great ass. The banker swung around, devolving from character to cast member, to stick his finger in the guy’s face and say sternly, “Do not talk about her that way.” The guy, clearly drunk but now chagrined, muttered something into his plastic cup of sugary cocktail and the scene resumed. Who wants to talk about a great opportunity for investment?
This was during an “immersive” performance of The Great Gatsby, which attempted to make a big splash in post-pandemic New York City theater. It was billed as a Jazz Age party, with music and dancing and drinking — the center of the ballroom had a full bar with specialty cocktails with clever names referencing Fitzgerald’s material — but the effect was more cruise ship than speakeasy. Audience members had been encouraged to dress up in period costume, and the whole place was just a sea of poly-blends and plastic beading. The booze was definitely flowing, and with the strict boundaries between audience and performer dissolved in the name of “immersion,” cast members had to dodge hands, belligerent behavior had to be corrected mid-scene, and carefully constructed composures kept cracking as people wandered off course and tried to insert themselves into the action. (Many performers of immersive theater have reported sexual harassment and assault by patrons over the years.)
I was thinking about this tragically awful The Great Gatsby while at Life and Trust, another Jazz Age immersive theatrical New York experience. This one is a Faust-story, although you’d only really know it if you read the materials provided before the show started. It’s the latest production from the team behind Sleep No More, the surprisingly successful immersive mashup of Shakespeare’s MacBeth and Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca — if you haven’t seen it, there’s no use trying to explain why these two intellectual properties are being shoved together except aesthetics — and this time we’re in the Conwell Tower in the Financial District for their customary blend of dance, theater, and set design. And if “Faust on Wall Street” seems like an easy pitch, yes, you are right, and the concept doesn’t seem to have been developed much beyond that. Temptations, libations, and being dragged to hell at the end.
There is of course a bar. The whole production starts there, and you’re encouraged to try one of their specialty cocktails before going into a “private meeting” with a banker who wants to give us some investment advice. So many of these immersive theatrical experiences are set in the 1920s, where you are of course one of the insiders who knows the secret code at the mafia-run bar to get the illicit booze and not someone going blind from drinking moonshine cut with turpentine. But the appeal is easy to figure out — a century ago we were also teetering on the edge of financial and geopolitical disaster, but those crises are deep in the past so safe to revisit. (In a hundred years, if humanity survives, it’s likely we’ll still be immersing ourselves in the Jazz Age over our current 21st century hellscape, as not even nostalgia is likely to make our skinny pants and dress sneakers and micro-plastic shedding crop tops look good.)
Like with Sleep No More, several floors of the building are designated as the performance space, with interactions and wordless performances and piped-in music scattered throughout small rooms. Audience members again all wear masks, to easily distinguish them from performers. And as an audience member you are meant to chase performers from room to room, floor to floor, trying to get a glimpse of… something. A dance, a fight scene, a fragment of a story. Something that might tie this to Faust and make the whole thing make sense.
Except it doesn’t, and the point of immersive theater is not really to make sense or tell a story. It’s to make a large mass of people feel very special. There’s always the possibility that you as an audience member will be addressed — not to be sternly corrected like at the Great Gatsby incident, but to be plucked from the anonymous mass by a cast member to become part of the action. Instead of passively watching the action happen, you are actively moving around and making choices. Because there is no correct order, no hope of seeing everything, each scene is constructed not to flow into the next but to offer stimulation and sensationalism. And while it is indeed thrilling to be in close proximity to a dancer’s body during a performance, and thrilling to be brushed up against or selected for interaction or taken by the hand and guided to the correct placement, three hours of intermittent and disconnected moments of interest doesn’t really add up to much.
The whole thing was very dissatisfying, but I started to wonder if the dissatisfaction was the point. That it wasn’t just the alcohol that reminded me of a cruise ship, or the pushy audience members emboldened by having their faces masked to throw elbows and shoulders for a better spot, but the overwhelming sense that something better is just around the corner. That you’re just missing it, coming in two beats too late but that if you keep looking for it, a good time is inevitable. I mean, sure, right now this food is bad, this comedian is bombing, this ballroom is tacky, this excursion is tedious, but things are sure to turn around. Maybe if we upgrade, maybe if we try this other part of the ship. Someone has to be enjoying themselves, otherwise why would we all be here?
There were small thrills, like a character I guess who is supposed to be some sort of tempting demon who at one point climbs the walls and seems to hover in a doorframe (I couldn’t help but admire her upper body strength), a weird orgy scene, and actually my martini with a twist was quite good. Narrative coherence was elusive, but there was always the suggestion that it was possible — that if one had better luck or followed a different character or didn’t get turned around in a stairwell and was left wandering and looking for something to happen for probably ten minutes, then the whole thing would make sense. This is why when I talked to Sleep No More superfans, they reported going more than a dozen times, including special parties at their cocktail lounge and storyline variations on holidays. Was any one show satisfying? No, of course not. If you were satisfied, there wouldn’t be the need to return and do it all over again.
Recommendations:
One thing keeps getting repeated in regards to the Los Angeles fires: there is no good source for information, meaning people have to wade through conspiracy theories, misinformation, and conflicting reports to figure out what is going on in their own neighborhoods and city. The Los Angeles Times is completely failing at the job, and people don’t know where to turn. This is reminiscent of disaster coverage this past hurricane season, where there is still not a really good accounting of what happened and to what extent. Local media is in shambles, even in major cities, and something needs to be done.
Devin Bingham wrote about Kiyoshi Kurosawa’s Chime and the United States military’s use of mindfulness to create better soldiers and killers for us, in case you missed it:
As someone who really and I mean really hates being goaded into audience participation of any kind, immersive theater sounds like a nightmare to me. Which also has me wondering who is most likely to be a fan of such a spectacle - my guess is, adult theater kids?
Patrick Soon-Shiong, the libertarian guy who bought the L.A. Times from the Chicago Tribune company, was caught furthering misinformation about the fires himself on Twitter. I kept seeing the "deboonked" claim about Karen Bass defunding the fire department to fund the police (which Politico noted allegedly wasn't true - she actually increased the fire dept's annual budget by $50m more while they were still in deliberations about it) - a claim a lot of my friends repeated, and which I think a lot of my L.A. friends have simply decided to believe because narrative simplicity is seductive, complicated truths aren't, and blaming institutions as unpopular as the police or their enablers is part of a larger pattern a lot of people have become used to. I also then saw the L.A. Times attempting damage control by releasing a little 30 second viral video about misinformation itself with one of its editors - but one that suspiciously didn't address the false claims of its own owner. All this being said, what struck me was - after Soon-Shiong was called out (albeit on a blog without the kind of reach or readership of a larger paper or the multiple political influencers who repeated his claims across social media - spreading rapidly and outside of containment much like the wildfires themselves), I realized his position was not wholly dissimilar from the historical position the L.A. Times has taken with regards to real estate and development interests in Los Angeles for most of its history - blaming more labor-friendly mayors for other endemic problems, enabling the water oligarchs & developers to escape blame, backing up Los Angeles's large network of boosters. I think we have all heard about how casually Soon-Shiong breaks the barrier an owner is supposed to maintain with editorial of an outlet he owns, but I kept thinking that he's still maintaining an old ideological line with that paper in particular.